Via of Viviane’s Sex Carnival says
A few Tweeters pointed me to Richard Abowitz’s article on why porn-for-profit is dying:
“Every January, the Adult Entertainment Expo in Las Vegas is the biggest annual gathering of the adult film industry. But the biggest is suddenly a lot smaller. The 2010 AEE convention, which ran Thursday through Sunday, had shrunk from packing two floors of the Venetian’s Sands Expo Center last year down to one floor (and that one with lots of empty space).”
Read the quote and follow the links to original sources here.
Following Viviane’s link to Abowitz’s article at Daily Beast the reasons he gives for porn’s decline are the kind of reasons we’d probably like to see.
The first one I’m going to mention is a bit of a wash, seems to be #5 Porn-star prostitutes. These are sex-workers who, rather than put up with the Johnny-Knoxville-ization of porn (double penetrations, etc.), knock off a couple of porn videos mainly so they can put “porn star” on their escort sites in order to impress the mostly-very-vanilla customers with whom they negotiate over social media.
Item #4 doesn’t sound that intuitive, but online games like Halo or 2nd Life are evidently more long-term engaging entertainment. Abowitz doesn’t make the connection directly but this seems to go with Reason #2: video on demand. the average porn consumer spends 4-7 minutes looking at porn while masturbating. They then spend the rest of their spare time playing Halo or 2nd Life or what have you.
The remaining two reasons start getting a little more interesting.
Abowitz labels item #3, “The Taboo Is Gone.” With stigma collapsing there are more aspiring porn stars than there is demand from people who might hire them. And yes, I’m aware that for some people this is a sign of complete moral decay.
If so fine, be that way. But if you consider that just a couple of decades ago it was often the case that most people who appeared in porn had to be either desperate or outright coerced due to stigmatization that’s not a bad thing at all.
Which brings us to item #1, piracy. Abowitz says “According to porn star Dana DeArmond: ‘If people don’t realize it is stealing and start paying for their porn then performers are going to stop performing.’”
I’m not sure exactly how this is a bad thing overall. As a strong proponent of appearing in erotica if and only if one actually wants to appear in erotica it seems like if you wouldn’t do it unless someone paid you then you probably… well… shouldn’t do it.
There are more than enough people who would, will, and do make their own erotica and post it free of charge. And as there’s less and less stigma attached to doing so the social cost of any individual expressing him or herself approaches the social enjoyment she or he may derive from doing so.
I’m sure this is a disappointing position to people who both enjoy appearing in erotica and would like to be paid to do so. Including people I know and like who really do enjoy the work and would like to make their income from it. For which I apologize.
But by and large I’m pretty sure we’d be better off encouraging enough amateurs to get involved that it becomes impossible for anyone to directly profit from it. Indirectly, yes, as with, say, the equivalent of Google AdWords on Blogger or Tumblr pages. But in the grand scheme of things that’s very small change compared to the money that’s been sloshing around in porn.
Summary: Given the vast empty space between squeamish (or non-existent) sex education and industrial porn it’s not surprising that some people might get… funny ideas about how to be sexy in bed.
Via someone or other on Twitter, Ashley Lindstrom of Zelda Lily takes a tip from Mary Elizabeth Williams (at Salon.com) and the magic question: Is Porn Making Men Bad at Sex?
[Williams] suggests that “the goal-oriented, money-shot, male-centric perspective of most porn (hint: Women don’t need to see that much fellatio) have changed us.” The ubiquity of this porn has put new pressure on women (and men; we’ll get there): Shaved pussies are expected. Pole-dancing skills don’t hurt either.
Men have new standards for themselves, too, regarding size and performance time – things that they perceive women wanting. (Which is a little funny, given the first sentence of the last paragraph; these poor dudes are doing it to themselves.) That’s where Williams comes in: “...thinking you can learn to make love to a woman from watching porn is like thinking you can learn to drive from watching The Fast and the Furious.”
That sounds about right. There’s all this debate about whether porn is bad because it does, or doesn’t, hurt the women who perform it. There’s all this debate about whether porn is bad, or isn’t, because it sets up expectations that porn-consumers partners have to be even more Cosmo-style performers.
But there’s not a lot of talk about how porn might be bad for the men (and it’s still primarily men) who are consuming it.
And I don’t mean “bad for men” in the sense that it makes them complicit in the (much-debated) degradation of pornography’s subjects. Or in the secualr sense that it makes them immoral and/or unfaithful. Nor in the even more narrowly secular sense that it makes them masturbate. Nor in the sense that it makes them judgmental or insensitive to their partners. Those have been debated, and settled to everyone’s satisfaction (ok, different settlements but still satisfying to their diverse adherents.)
What’s not debated so much is how porn might be bad for men’s sex lives.
I’ve talked about it before but Salon’s Williams nails it with
He’d been jackhammering away for what felt like hours. “You like that, baby? You like that?” he asked, though he didn’t notice I wasn’t answering. And then, somewhere around the 18th time he said it, it hit me — I wasn’t just having bad sex. I was having bad porn sex.
Thing is, based on my own experience, jackhammering away hoping your partner “likes that, baby, likes that” isn’t as good as it gets for men either.
—-
Obligatory disclaimer: Obviously not all porn demonstrates bad sexual technique. Just the 90% of it that, according to Sturgeon’s Law, is crap.
Earlbecke of Definition – A Feminist Weblog places a compass rose on the map of the pornography debate (emphasis mine):
On the other hand, I do have a lot of huge problems with the pornography industry. I have huge problems with most industries, being the radical pinko commie that I am. I know the industry harms women, both those who participate in the making of pornography and those who are exposed to it, and that is wrong and needs to be changed. I don’t disagree with the anti-porn crowd on the harm mainstream porn does.
“I have a huge problem with most industries.” That, I think, is the North and South of the modern controversy over porn. (Or, if you must, then only for me.) I have a problem with factory farming but I don’t think the answer is to eat only what I can grow. There are 10,000 legitimate recourses in between from Whole Foods to CSA/share-farms to roadside stands. Similarly I have problems with industrial beer and wine but I don’t think the answer is to stop drinking altogether. (Ok, for other people to stop — I quit, at age 21 as sort of a joke.) And goodness knows I have a very hard time with “industrial” restaurant chains in every dimension from exploitation of labor to promotion of monocropping to gajeezablicly bad-for-you ingredients to ghastly sanitation practices) but that doesn’t mean I think everyone should stay home and cook every meal, fresh, from scratch.

Same with porn. Via Jess McCabe, Laurie Penny of Pennyred has this advice, aimed for boys and men but good for everyone who consumes porn:
2. Change your porn habits.
Everyone likes a good wank, don?t they? However, not all groin-bashing-material is equal. When ?harmless fantasy? involves the exploitation and abuse of women -either in the industry itself, which is deeply murky and unequal, or in the situations portrayed – it?s not okay, I?m afraid. We can save the Great Porn Debate for another time. Thankfully, however, there is a great deal of woman-positive pornography out there: particularly professional voluntary sites like the excellent Suicide Girls, the delights of which I?ll leave you to savour for yourself. Sites like Pornotube also contain a lot of voluntary, amateur stuff which – whilst not half as polished as professional pornography – are good for a giggle, and often show footage which is both a lot closer to real sex, and surprisingly hot. If anyone has other links to share and discuss, do comment below.
Earlbecke adds
All sexually explicit material is pornographic, and not all of it is necessarily bad. Just, you know, most of it, which is true of a lot of other less controversial things in this sick, misogynistic world. Admitting that there are other ways of depicting sexuality and that not all depictions are bad doesn’t really hurt the anti-mainstream-porn case, so far as I can tell  but using definitions of “pornography” which are not standard and highly subjective is harmful to those of us who use sex in our art and writing as a way of exploring female empowerment.
And it’s so baffling to me that we can come from the same place  “mainstream porn is disgusting, degrading, misogynist, and racist”  and still not manage to even have a rational discussion about the subject.
I’m perfectly aware that the mere scope of an undertaking doesn’t make it good or bad, but it is the case that the economic constraints and the logistical scale of industrial pornography militate strongly towards not simply a lowest-common-denominator product (since, by definition, most people are more squicked by porn than not) but by a lowest whoever-will-consistently-buy-more-of-the-stuff denominator. You can say a lot of different things about hand-crafted beer but one thing you can’t say about them is “some people can drink them by the case” the way they can about industrial beers.

Now. Is it particularly healthy to consume beer by the case? Um, no. People who do tend to be, or to quickly become, physical wrecks. But if you’re brewing your “macrobeer” in “vats the size of Rhode Island” those guys are going to be your bread and butter. And I just have a feeling that, with their low margins and high turnover, industrial pornographers have to aim for the similar types of high-volume something-wrong-there consumers that beer companies, lottery pushers, home-shopping networks, and fast-food vendors depend on.
Sure, pornography has other dimensions and there are legitimate questions to ask in all of them, but on any map one cares to draw Industrial North is going to be the most significant line, the one that everything else orients to.